Monday, 30 December 2013

Meanwhile, back in the real world......UPDATED!

Ralph Cinque doesn't like to be challenged. He doesn't like it because it exposes him. This is why the places where Ralph posts are tightly controlled environments where he allows little or no opposing viewpoint to be expressed.

Now, Ralph's original "Visible Proof" video was shared on Youtube some time ago by someone called "MsNoWorldOrder". This person doesn't censor comments on the video, so let's take a look at how people in the real world actually react to Ralph's "visible proof". Here's a selection of the most recent comments -

Ralph Cinque, Billy Lovelady, Altgens 6, Doorway Man, JFK
Ralph Cinque, Billy Lovelady, Altgens 6, Doorway Man, JFK
Ralph Cinque, Billy Lovelady, Altgens 6, Doorway Man, JFK
Ralph Cinque, Billy Lovelady, Altgens 6, Doorway Man, JFK

Ralph Cinque, Billy Lovelady, Altgens 6, Doorway Man, JFK
Ralph Cinque, Billy Lovelady, Altgens 6, Doorway Man, JFK
Ralph Cinque, Billy Lovelady, Altgens 6, Doorway Man, JFK
Ralph Cinque, Billy Lovelady, Altgens 6, Doorway Man, JFK
Ralph Cinque, Billy Lovelady, Altgens 6, Doorway Man, JFK
Ralph Cinque, Billy Lovelady, Altgens 6, Doorway Man, JFK
Ralph Cinque, Billy Lovelady, Altgens 6, Doorway Man, JFK
Ralph Cinque, Billy Lovelady, Altgens 6, Doorway Man, JFK
Ralph Cinque, Billy Lovelady, Altgens 6, Doorway Man, JFK
Ralph Cinque, Billy Lovelady, Altgens 6, Doorway Man, JFK
Ralph Cinque, Billy Lovelady, Altgens 6, Doorway Man, JFK
Ralph Cinque, Billy Lovelady, Altgens 6, Doorway Man, JFK
Ralph Cinque, Billy Lovelady, Altgens 6, Doorway Man, JFK

  And my personal favourite -

Ralph Cinque, Billy Lovelady, Altgens 6, Doorway Man, JFK

We can see here that a high percentage of people see perfectly clearly that doorman is wearing a plaid or patterned shirt, which comes as no great surprise - because he was.

Billy Lovelady, Altgens 6, JFK, Doorway Man, Ralph Cinque

We might not see all of the detail of the pattern but remember we've already seen, using Ralph's own photos, that at this distance in an unfocused shot we shouldn't expect to. ( explored in the original piece here - ).
Fortunately, and refreshingly, the vast majority of people are nowhere near as dumb as Ralph needs them to be. They believe the evidence of their own eyes. The Doorway Man is clearly wearing a patterned shirt.

A few of the comments above go further in that they are perceptive enough to point out that Ralph disproves his own case. Because that is in effect exactly what he is doing every single time he shows you something like this while asking you to believe that Oswald's shirt is a match to the doorway man -

Ralph Cinque, Billy Lovelady, Altgens 6, Doorway Man, JFK

Ralph Cinque, Altgens 6, Billy Lovelady, Doorway Man, JFK

Ralph has even told us on his blog what to look for...

Ralph Cinque, Billy Lovelady, Altgens 6, Doorway Man, JFK

They are indeed double lines as Ralph describes, and some of them are very clearly visible in Altgens 6. 

Now the thing is...Ralph is well aware of this. He sometimes is forced to use clearer photos than he'd like when attempting to make other points, but when pressed on the obvious pattern he will always revert back to showing you this -

Ralph Cinque, Lies, Billy Lovelady, Altgens 6, Doorway Man, JFK

This is Ralph's "get out of jail" doorway image, in which the doorway part on the right is an umpteenth generation internet copy of Altgens which in addition has been through the process of offset printing for publication in a book. We can see that it has virtually no detail, but this is of course exactly what Ralph is looking for.

Here's Ralph on Youtube, involved in a discussion about another of his incorrect assertions regarding the Altgens photo -

Ralph Cinque, Lies, Billy Lovelady, Altgens 6, Doorway Man

Notice his comments regarding the Groden scan of Altgens, which I have used for my comparisons on this blog. " I have the Groden copy of Altgens, which I believe is the most clear...."
Why then would he choose to use any other copy of the photo when making his points? The reason is painfully obvious - clarity is the last thing that Ralph requires when attempting to sell you the lie that Oswald's shirt matches Doorman's.

As we've seen, fortunately most people are far too smart to fall for this scam. Of course there will always be some that get taken in. Even the Flat Earth Society still has members, although I'd bet that not many of them would fall for the line of B.S that Ralph is pushing.

I'm giving the last word to this guy. Whoever he is, I'm a big fan....

Ralph Cinque, Billy Lovelady, Altgens 6, Doorway Man, JFK


Ralph is either not all that quick on the uptake or has nowhere left to go with this because he seems to think that just posting a zoomed - in view of the photo that proved him wrong the first time will somehow magically help him out now. It doesn't - but that's OK because it gives me chance to re - ask the question that he dodged the first time.

Ralph Cinque, Lies, Billy Lovelady, Altgens 6, Doorway Man, JFK

You see Ralph, it really doesn't matter what Harold Weisberg or anybody else thought. And it's not going to matter until the day that you produce a photo of Oswald in a shirt which matches the clearly visible straight line features on Doormans shirt. And don't forget that they should be the double lines, alternating white over black and black over white which you so eloquently decribed for us on your blog. ( I'm trying to make it easy for you here because I haven't even bothered to mention the visible white vertical line ).
What you're actually looking for is a match as good as, say....well, this.

Billy Lovelady, JFK, Doorway Man, Altgens 6, Ralph Cinque

Good luck with that.....

You're right about one thing though, the word is certainly out....and the word is that folks can see the glow from your burning underwear all across the world.

Tuesday, 8 October 2013


is currently getting in the way of blogging. Sometimes you just gotta deal with other stuff.

Hope to be back in a couple of days - still to come, among other things, is part two of the documentation of Ralph Cinque's alterations to CE 369.

Meanwhile, a big thank you for the healthy and very consistent flow of visitors the blog has been getting. Keep spreading the word.....

And finally for now, if anyone reading is a current member of the Education Forum or knows the contact details for JFK researcher Bill Miller, please drop me an email.

Back soon....


It seems Ralph is so desperate to have people think he has something meaningful to say that he felt it was necessary to post a long rant in response to the few lines I wrote above.

I was going to do a few lines for him explaining how the Internet works ( in a really simple way, because explaining stuff to Ralph is much like dealing with a small child ). However I notice it's already been done very well, and you can read it here -

And I'd leave it at that, apart from the fact that one other small thing needs to be addressed.

I got one of these -

Didn't take long, did it? 

Despite the fact that Ralph's long, well documented but ultimately pathetic email intimidation campaign has revealed in the past that he has certain "tendencies", I think this is the first time he's declared an interest in fisting. Still, maybe having gone this far he'll take the final step and come out publicly, a step that I'm sure would gain him some respect.

Which would be more than you could say about anything he's ever contributed to JFK research.

Friday, 4 October 2013

Almost forgot...

to mention that Ralph has taken to asking for a pattern match between these two images -

Ralph Cinque, Altgens 6, JFK, Doorway Man.

I'll just point out that the image on the left is a blurry frame from the Wiegman film showing Lovelady in the doorway ( left side of the pic). It's shot from a moving car and in terms of the detail it contains is in no way comparable to the Altgens photo. Ralph knows this but thinks he's being smart, when actually the fact that he made this request proves two things.

1. Ralph is a moron.
2. Ralph is a moron.

I realize that technically that's only one thing but it's such an important one I thought it was worth mentioning twice.

For the match between the Groden Picture of Lovelady and Doorman, look here -

Ralph Cinque alterations to CE 369, part 1 UPDATED!

In my last post and the subsequent update I showed you how Ralph, who has spent the last few days banging on about marking the "area of examination" drew in a false black line on the image he presented. There's a red arrow pointing to it here -

Ralph Cinque, Lies, JFK, Altgens 6

He needs you to believe that the line is there in order to suggest the shaft of his imaginary arrow. There is no valid version of CE 369 in which that solid black line exists.

In a classic Cinque display of fake outrage and indignation, Ralph protests he's done no such thing and offers this as untouched version of CE 369.

Ralph Cinque, Lies, JFK, Altgens 6

Ralph doesn't realize that this immediately proves the point he's trying to deny. Let's just overlay both of his versions and switch between them -

Ralph Cinque, Lies, JFK, Altgens 6

Sure enough, the black line vanishes along with Ralph's imaginary arrowhead.

Ralph Cinque, busted liar so many times before, goes one step further and shows us that when the evidence doesn't fit he's happy to falsify it.

Tomorrow we'll look at how Ralph uses his photo editor of choice, Picassa, to mangle CE 369 into the crappy versions he uses in his presentations.


He just can't stop the bullshit...

Ralph Cinque, Liar, JFK

I didn't say you did it with a black marker but you sure as hell did it with the same software you used for your fake arrowhead.

Not that he'll give his reader's a link here so that they can see the proof. What a spineless, lying pussy this sad little fool is.

Wednesday, 2 October 2013

Ah, I see... UPDATED!

Well that all makes sense now Ralph, thanks.


In Ralph's "Rules of how to present the evidence so I can cheat" it's fine to draw in stuff which doesn't exist ..

Ralph Cinque, Lies, JFK, Altgens 6

Notice that what Ralph found ( which is in the red circle ) has to be augmented by a black line coming off the forearm and a white arrowhead to make it into anything at all.

At this point I would have quoted some of Ralph's text to make the point that he's lying again, but he's suddenly become pretty paranoid about that and disabled right clicking on his blog. In future I'll just screengrab anything that I want you to see directly, but as I've always said I'll provide the links to Ralph's articles so you can head over and check the lies for yourself.

I'm too pressed for time to do screen grabs right now, so I'll just point out that despite his claims not to have marked the forearm he's had to draw a black line on it to give the impression that such a line exists. And then draw in a big white arrow which he wants you to think is there while trying to claim that the "area of examination" shouldn't include the very place where the arrow is supposedly located.

However, while pointing out that there's nothing that Ralph won't lie about is fun, let's not forget that what he's engaged in is simple evasion. Ralph's imaginary arrow isn't the topic under discussion, I only mentioned it to draw attention to the fact that he's a massive hypocrite. In several days now there's not been a single credible attempt to refute this -

Billy Lovelady, Altgens 6, JFK, Doorway Man

Billy Lovelady, Altgens 6, JFK, Doorway Man

Clear visual evidence that the man in the doorway was wearing the plaid shirt and was therefore the Billy Lovelady. Clear visual evidence that the O.I.C is wrong about everything.

He can't refute it.
He won't show it.
He begs people not to look at it.

It's time to start seriously questioning the motives and integrity of everybody involved in the O.I.C scam.


Oh please Ralph, spare us the fake outrage.

The thick black line in your picture has nothing to do with the image in the History Matters archive, which I've enlarged here.

Ralph Cinque, Lies, CE 369, Altgens 6

Doesn't look a lot like yours does it? 

Ralph Cinque, Lies, CE 369, Altgens 6

Let's hope that EVERYBODY takes you up on your suggestion to go there and try it for themselves. Here's the link -

Any more holes you want to dig for yourself? Busted yet again...your miniscule membership must be so proud of you.

And furthermore Ralph, copies of CE 369 are quite hard to find on the net. I've searched carefully and can't find that terrible copy you use anywhere except in your posts, so unless you provide a link to the site you got it from we're going to have to assume that it only exists in your posts and on your hard drive. Which would mean the reason it's so very bad is not Ralph?

And don't forget that the invisible arrow is meaningless -

Billy Lovelady, JFK, Altgens 6, Doorway Man

Billy Lovelady was in the doorway.

Tuesday, 1 October 2013

I can't stop laughing! UPDATED!

Wasn't gonna be posting again today but I can't let this one go!

Nice post from Mr "You can't mark the area of examination"!

Ralph Cinque, Lies, JFK, Altgens 6

Hard to type for laughing!

Have a read of this Ralph, and thanks for making everybody's day!

And by the way, where did that god - awful copy copy of CE 369 come from?


Jesus Ralph, can anybody really be this stupid?

You draw in a black line and a white arrow which isn't there and then attempt to claim you didn't mark the "area of examination"? 

Comedy Gold.

You see, what you found was a black speck, and added a black line and a big white arrow to it to suggest that that's what it is. When you take away your arrow you've got a black speck.

The difference when I do it Ralph is that when I fade the lines away the features they refer to are still there...

Billy Lovelady, JFK, Altgens 6, Doorway Man

And...where does that terrible copy of CE 369 originate from Ralph?

A few reflections...UPDATED!

Well it's been an interesting few days. Nothing much to add today, and Mrs. Uppercut is demanding that I do some other stuff, so I'll just offer you these few thoughts.

Ralph is protesting wildly and desperately trying to get me to play with one of his collages .The reason for that is that he's still trying to sell you a false comparison. He wants you to believe that a tiny, unfocused portion of a large picture shot from distance will have the detail and clarity of a shot taken from a few feet away. That's why he offers you garbage like this, cropping the Altgens portion as much as he thinks he can get away with and the Groden one to remove most of the vertical white line seen in Altgens.

Ralph Cinque, Lies, JFK, Altgens 6

Notice, however, that he had to leave SOMETHING in - and we can both horizontal lines and a vertical one in the Altgens part ( And no Ralph, I'm not pointing them out to you. I've already done it, and people can see what I'm talking about. )

Altgens doesn't contain the same level of clarity and detail as a close up shot, as we've seen using one of Ralph's own pictures. There's absolutely no reason to think that it should. The only way Ralph could get a box to appear on his shirt in Dealy Plaza was by wearing one with a huge white square on the front and then attempting to claim that that's in some way a meaningful result which is comparable to Lovelady's shirt pattern. It isn't. It never was.

But there IS detail remaining in the Altgens photo, and that's what I'm showing here.  As we've seen, I've presented my evidence and explained the steps I took. And here's the thing.

It's not rocket science. There are no tricks.  Anybody with a basic knowledge of graphics software can sit down and do the same thing. ( And anybody who's already familiar with this stuff will do it in minutes and in all probability do it better - I had to learn how to do it first ). I used free software. Hell, with a bit of effort even Ralph could do it.

And ignore Ralph's attempt to muddy the waters by speculating about my identity or claiming that I'm an "op", as if that in some way affects the validity of what I'm showing you. It's a false argument. The evidence I've shown stands on it's own merits. It is what it is. And that would still be true even if I posted tomorrow saying that I'm David von Pein. ( that's a joke Ralph ).

I'm claiming no special credit for noticing the pattern. Most people who look at the clearest version of Altgens 6 can see it anyway. I'm just presenting it in a way which makes it immediately obvious and cuts out the bogus comparisons offered to you by the O.I.C. That's all.

So by all means try it yourself. The only way any of that pattern matches up is that Doorman is wearing Billy Lovelady's shirt.

Billy Lovelady, JFK, Altgens 6, OIC

Billy Lovelady, JFK, Altgens 6, Ralh Cinque

He is. That's because Doorman is Billy Nolan Lovelady.


And the only update on this post. I've got stuff to do.

Two things.
The shot he shows you as a "true" depiction is hopelessly blurred and is probably from a magazine reprint which has been uploaded countless times. I don't know without checking and he probably doesn't know himself. It doesn't matter because the Groden doorway scan is the closest thing to the original  he's ever going to see unless he gets off his lazy ass and goes to the National Archives. Oh wait....Ralph....research....not gonna happen.

And I already did one of those Ralph. I chose this one -

Billy Lovelady, Altgens 6, JFK, Lance Uppercut

Billy Lovelady, Altgens 6, Oswald Innocence, Jfk

Billy Lovelady, Altgens 6, Ralph Cinque is a liar, JFK

See Ralph, the way this works is that I've refuted your evidence. You're supposed to attempt to refute mine. 

And shove your instructions where the sun don't shine. Whoops, that's three things. My bad....

Monday, 30 September 2013

Wild guesses, Lies and speculation...UPDATED and UPDATED AGAIN! and just once more...

are about the sum total of what Ralph can offer.

Ralph thinks nobody can spot the dishonesty involved in attempting to rebut this evidence while refusing to reference any of it. Again, I'm more than happy for you to head over and read his piece because it's important to realize how Ralph operates.

Please notice that I'm offering solid visual matches while Ralph gives you a guess Lovelady's weight competition and an argument about a non - existent pocket flap that was long ago debunked on both the Ed Forum and JFK Lancer, while begging people not to come here and view the evidence. Draw your own conclusions.......

And as to your request for a screenshot of my Blogger account details Ralph, sure...maybe you'd like my bank login too? All you need to know is that today's numbers are way better than yesterdays.

Oh and by the way Ralph, I keep telling you I'll discuss the arm when I'm ready. You have yet to begin explaining the pattern on the shirt front. I'll wait....


Point proved.

Ralph will try to confuse you by refusing to show the evidence I've provided. I've been very clear throughout in explaining how I arrived at my conclusion. He doesn't want you to know this. There are no rules about how the evidence should be presented except the imaginary ones he makes up  to obfuscate ( see what I did there Ralph? ) the truth. Ralph thinks you are stupid.

What he fails to realize is that the pattern is quite easy to spot once you know what you're looking for. Remember that we're looking at a blow up of a tiny, unfocused portion of Altgens.  Remember that we've seen using Ralph's own photo that under those conditions we don't see crispness and clearness. Take a good look at the evidence here, then head back to Ralph's and look again. Much easier to see now, isn't it?

He's spent two years hoping no - one would notice.

Those days are gone.


Ralph digs a deeper hole -

In desperation Ralph moves to a tight crop but now he doesn't want to show you all of the area we're looking at in Altgens. You see, Ralph's quandry is that he doesn't want to show you this evidence on any of his sites because it's toxic to the O.I.C. This is a man who has previously stolen every piece of other's work he can lay his hands on, never giving the author credit and in some cases trying to pass it off as something produced by the O.I.C. Here, he won't even link to it. Once again, draw your own conclusions.

"Mr. 19 says the pattern is easy to spot when you know what to look for. Then tell them what to look for. I don't mind that. But, don't mark within the area of examination.

Did you hear what I said? I said: Do not mark within the area of examination."

EARTH TO RALPH - I HAVE SHOWN THEM WHAT TO LOOK FOR. Nobody cares about your demands Ralph. I am free to present the evidence in any way I choose. Didn't Richard Hooke tell you exactly the same thing just recently? Don't mark the area of examination?

Seriously? And that's just the first one I came across, there's plenty of O.I.C. stuff with so many markings you can barely make out the photo. ( And I don't mind showing that here, because of course if Doorman's shirt is patterned - and I've shown that it  is - ALL the rest of it is irrelevant ).

 My presentations show the areas unmarked as well as marked. They make it very clear. Everyone is watching you lie about that. I can't see how you think that makes you look good but I guess it's your choice.


Because even making Ralph demonstrate over and over again that he has nothing can get boring after a while.

Pretty much too dumb to respond to. We all saw what you did with the cropping Ralph.
To everybody else, just notice that Ralph is running through his old bag of tricks to avoid having to address any evidence. And notice how desperate he is to drag everything back to the old collage treatment, where he imagines he might have a chance to regain some ground. Not happening Ralph.
Just re-read what I've already told you above. My evidence is already presented. We're waiting for a credible response. Although I predict it'll go something like this...

How much confirmation do we need?

What happens if we use a different shot of Lovelady posing in his plaid shirt to make the comparison?

This time we're using this 1978 shot of Lovelady taken by Robert Groden -

A photo of Billy Lovelady taken by Robert Groden in 1978

As before, the shirt was isolated, cropped, separated, rotated and resized to fit. That's all.

As before, the results are conclusive.
( Once again these gifs are quite large so please allow plenty of time for them to load ).

This animated gif overlays the Robert Groden picture of Billy Lovelady's plaid shirt onto Altgens 6, demonstrating the perfect match in the pattern

Even though the shirt lapel is lying a little differently in this Groden photo to the way it laid in the Jackson one we used previously you can see that the angle of the right collar ( left as we view it )  is once again a perfect match to Altgens. The matches to all of the previously noted horizontal lines remain intact.

As before, we overlay the shirt in position to match up the obvious vertical line on the left side ( our right ).

This animated gif overlays the Robert Groden picture of Billy Lovelady's plaid shirt onto Altgens 6, demonstrating the perfect match in the pattern

As before, is there any chance that "haze" organizes itself into the clearly distinguishable patterns we can see here? No.

Ralph - you need to explain to Judyth that she's wasting her time trying to match microscopic flecks to Doorman's shirt. To match Lee's shirt to Doorman she's going to have to find black and white horizontal and vertical lines on it. And that's probably going to take her a while.