Monday, 9 June 2014

Unsurprisingly, Ralph Cinque fails perspective 101 the same way as he fails everything else.....miserably UPDATED! and UPDATED AGAIN!

One thing you can say for Oswald Innocence Campaign founder Ralph Cinque is that he's not one to miss an opportunity to display his utter ignorance of the subjects he likes to bloviate on. 

For days now, Cinque has been arguing in a lengthy exchange with Joe Backes and Robin Unger over perspective issues between the Altgens photograph and the Tina Towner film of the motorcade as it made the turn onto Elm Street ( or Tina TURNER, as Ralphie hilariously described her! I'm not sure who's using the O.I.C brain cell this week but it sure as hell isn't Ralph...).

During the course of this exhange both Joe and Robin have repeatedly shown Ralph to be utterly clueless, but as we have seen many times before Ralph Cinque's massively inflated ego will never allow him to back down.

The perspectively - challenged Ralph insists that the guy indicated by the red arrow in this Altgens crop from Robin Unger -

A crop of the Altgens photograph indicating the figure in question

is not the same figure as this man in the Towner film -

Frame from the Towner film indicating the man in question

Check out Robin Unger's blog here -
and here -
to follow Robin's patient explanation, and Joe Backes here -
tearing Ralph a new one in his own inimitable style! ( about the last 35 of Joe's posts are relevant to this discussion, starting with the one entitled "Dr.No depth perception strikes out, again").

Despite the massive amount of evidence produced showing that he's a fucking moron, Cinque decides to re-enforce the point by popping over to Wikipedia to check out what "angle of view" is - and comically reproducing a whole page of formulae before realising that it's a bit more complicated than he thought and being forced to admit he has no clue what any of it means, and posting utter crap like this -

Ralph Cinque gets perspective in the Altgens photo utterly wrong...


Now pay attention Ralph. They are the same man, photographed from two different positions. Robin Unger has detailed Tina Towner's position here -
It's really not that hard, and I've prepared a little 3D animation to show what's going on. In the following gif, the figure in question is represented by the blue cone. Can the guy who appears to be aligned with the end of the white TSBD facade in Altgens be the same guy we see in Towner? 

Animation showing perspective differences between Altgens and Towner

He most certainly can. Two photographers shooting from different positions, same man. As always, Ralph Cinque has no understanding of ANYTHING he is attempting to assert.

Coming soon, we'll be looking at Cinque's recent attempts to insinuate that his detractors on Facebook are paedophiles and his slurs against a mother who proved another of his B.S arguments to be completely wrong - and discussing the implications for the other senior members of the Oswald Innocence Campaign.

Last word on this one goes to Joe Backes -

Joe Backes explains to the hapless Ralph Cinque


The standard of Cinque's debate....

Ralph Cinque has the mind of a child, as he's always ready to demonstrate

Utterly pathetic, you sad old bastard. Still, when you've got nothing.......


Sorry about this everybody, Ralph's just being.....well, Ralph....

I know you find it difficult to comprehend this stuff Ralph, but I referenced Robin's page. We're both placing him in the same spot....

I didn't single him out did. You have been shown how the "physics" works ( we're talking about perspective...). There are no tricks. This can be easily reproduced by anyone. Do you have anything which challenges that? Nah, didn't think so.

Ralph, if you think I'm going to sit down and reconstruct a 3D model of Dealy Plaza just to refute your utter nonsense, think again. Obviously the same effect applies, relatively, to those around him. Instead of attempting to move the goalposts every time you're refuted, why don't you for once do some actual work and try to tackle what I presented? And while you're at it, why are don't you go back and link to my blog in all those Facebook groups you're crowing in as though you've proved something? Oh wait, I know....

Yeah I did Ralph. I made the point that not only do you not have a point, when shown to be wrong you ALWAYS attempt to muddy the issue by introducing factors that weren't under discussion or in some way attempting to change the focus of the issue. It is self - evident that others in the photo are affected by the same perspective changes. Why don't you attempt to map the whole thing yourself Ralph? It's called research, and in the process you might actually educate yourself about something. Unlikely, but you never know....

Knock youself out Ralph, but let's remember that the only thing you ever achieved in Dealy Plaza up to now is a demonstration of just how wrong you can get things. Oh, and of how much you're prepared to lie and cheat in your efforts to make yourself look important...
What I have shown you will "pan out" just fine if you do an accurate test....but of course with you that's going to be the problem.

Well it's a tempting offer, but since we already know you're just going attempt to rig your test and then refuse to pay....fuck off.....
Oh, and pay MJ her money, cheapskate.....


  1. Great animation Lance

    Same hat man, same location seen from two different perspectives.

    It lines up perfectly

  2. Excellent work as always!

    Keep it up Lance !

  3. If all this doesn't shame the OIC 'Senior Members' into resigning, perhaps your next offerings will. Way to go, Lance. We salute thee, sir ! Onward toward vanquishing this asshat/pervert once and for all.

  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

  5. Gosh, Lance, you're way ahead of Ralphie's 1,123 posts…….. you've got 1,151.
    No, wait……. those are parenthesis !!!! Sorry.